Thread: Unichip Tuner
View Single Post
  #401 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008, 10:48 PM
Mr. Creosote's Avatar
Mr. Creosote Mr. Creosote is offline
Legendary Contributor
 
My Garage
N/A
My Details
Last Online: Today 03:14 AM
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: .
Posts: 14,839
Rep Power: 42
Mr. Creosote has done just about everything. Mr. Creosote has done just about everything. Mr. Creosote has done just about everything. Mr. Creosote has done just about everything. Mr. Creosote has done just about everything. Mr. Creosote has done just about everything. Mr. Creosote has done just about everything. Mr. Creosote has done just about everything. Mr. Creosote has done just about everything. Mr. Creosote has done just about everything. Mr. Creosote has done just about everything.
Mr. Creosote's Photo Albums
Default Re: Unichip Tuner

Quote:
Originally Posted by www.Unichip.us View Post
A G-tech is a fine product, but it’s not a precision instrument and better suited to for general monitoring. Repeatability to within 1% isn’t what it’s designed for; if it was, the guys selling the $10k data loggers would be looking for a new job. If you do six runs back to back, you’ll see six different results. We used a G-tech on the 5.7L Tundra. We did 16 runs with and without the Unichip within a 1 hour period on the same day at nearly the same temperature, on the same test road and still had to average. It’s the nature of the beast.
I found the GTech repeatability to be reasonable. Any significant variances I had were due to not cooling down enough between passes, or idling too long before launching (i.e. begins to heat soak).
Reply With Quote