View Single Post
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 05-18-2009, 10:52 AM
123Gone's Avatar
123Gone 123Gone is offline
Supporter
 
My Garage
N/A
My Details
Last Online: Today 09:31 AM
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 1,565
Rep Power: 9
123Gone will become famous soon enough.
123Gone's Photo Albums
Default Re: Rhino-Liner vs. Speedliner opinions (No Line-x)

Quote:
Originally Posted by psmith01 View Post
I love niether rhino nor speedliner.Recently I have applied Qwikliner on my truck.I like qwikliner because

I like Qwikliner because

1 Toughest Environmentally Friendly Spray on bedliner
2 Qwikliner the High UV Stable Spray on Bed liner
3 Qwikliner Mobile Spray on Bed liner
4 Low / No Maintenance & Cleanup
5 Spray on Bed liner with a Low Cost Startup
Thanks this thread is not for the line -x.specially 123 gone do you know he is the paid promotor of line -x.
1. Not true. Qwikliner is a hybrid (polyurethane/polyurea), but obviously does not have much polyurea in it because Qwikliner's data sheet shows a 232.5 psi tear strength. Hybrids with more polyurea tend to have higher tear strengths. 100% polyurea is the strongest.
2. All bedliner brands say they are UV stable. But, only the aliphatic products are really UV proof. Qwikliner is not aliphatic.
3. Qwikliner is applied at low pressure using a cartridge gun. Mobile? Yes, but low pressure is not as desirable has a high pressure application.
4. Number 4 is a rather insignificant statement.
5. Yes, the guns cost about $400. But, again, it's a "second class" application process.

Reply With Quote