Thread: Safety Recall!
View Single Post
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 05-18-2005, 12:16 PM
Mike Donofrio's Avatar
Mike Donofrio Mike Donofrio is offline
Veteran Member
 
My Garage
N/A
My Details
Last Online: 05-04-2009 09:43 AM
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Jersey
Posts: 1,482
Rep Power: 9
Mike Donofrio is on a distinguished road.
Mike Donofrio's Photo Albums
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Propak
RF was the upper ball snapping off while the LF was the "socket" shattering resulting in the upper ball dislocating.
That 'socket' is part of the spindle, and Toyota is saying that they'll replace the balljoints themselves?!?!? It doesn't sound like replacing the balljoint would have cured the problem in your case and the actual repair may aggravate it. The act of pressing the balljoint into the 'socket' stresses the casting of the spindle and forces the balljoint into the hole that's a 1-2mm too small. If they are replacing the balljoints and the spindles are failing, it's a much bigger issue than we are led to believe. The balljoints may actually be the wrong size or the hole in the spindle (the 'socket')

The two situations you've described are failure in the spindle AND the ball joint. They failed on two separate (but related) components is that correct?
__________________
Mike D

Lost traction? Lock it up!!! Front locker install instructions here: http://www.teddnet.com/LockRightInstall.pdf

2000 Tundra with 175,000 miles and still going!

Upgrades: PA 3" Body Lift, Powertrax No-Slip rear, Detroit ezLocker front, Fabtech/Fox front, Wheeler's AALs, TC Front Diff Drop, 16 x 8 MB Wheels, 285/75R16 Goodyear Wrangler MT/Rs, Pioneer Head Unit, Infiniti Reference speakers [front and rear], 150 W bridged amp to bandpass enclosure, 6 CD changer with IR remote, iPod mini and xm hardwired into stereo, Toyota drop in bedliner, and Tonneau cover
Reply With Quote