I guess you didn’t see Clinton on TV when he pointed his finger at the camera (us) and said “I did not have sexual relations with her”
He is also the one that signed the NAFTA bill. It doesn’t really matter who was President I would guess any one of them would have.
The president is a figure head no matter what party he is.
Our troubles stem from Congress because they make the laws and pass the bills.
If that is true as I believe it is, then the blame comes down to the American people who keep voting some of these jerks in. Some of these people have been Congress over 40 years and what do they have to show for it other than fat wallets. When enough people get fed up things will change, that is, unless it’s too late.
Being twenty would be nice again but I honestly feel bad for those who are because this country is going to be a second rate power in 10-15 years.
The leaders of the world are going to have everyone make the same wages so it’s truly a World Economy, we go down like most of Europe and the third world countries go up.
When China finishes building its blue water navy we can quit worrying about what is crossing our southern border and worry about the west coast.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by laugs1
Buzzard,
I just noticed that you say the President has nothing to do with the workforce problem, then complain about Homeland Security not securing the border, which he has everything to do with.
I'll take Clinton over Bush any day. Who doesn't like a BJ once in a while? Seriously, Clinton lied to an investigator on a witch hunt, but Bush lied to me.
I agree that this is about the bottom line for Toyota. First, for healthcare, which is skyrocketing; and second, there's probably a certain density of factories that they want to avoid because they will have to compete for workers by increasing pay. Maybe they think there are already too many plants in the Southern US??
Larry
|