View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 07-13-2005, 10:36 PM
Tundrav8yamaha's Avatar
Tundrav8yamaha Tundrav8yamaha is offline
Banned
 
My Garage
N/A
My Details
Last Online: 09-26-2009 08:30 AM
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Fish bowl (lol)
Age: 32
Posts: 8,397
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 0
Tundrav8yamaha is on a distinguished road.
Send a message via AIM to Tundrav8yamaha Send a message via Yahoo to Tundrav8yamaha Tundrav8yamaha's Photo Albums
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sweetwater
Mmm... I agree with hsvhobbit. Only 35K on my 2003 and still have original pads with not a lot of wear. My driving is half city and half highway. I expect my original pads to last at least 60-70K, hopefully longer. That's 5-6 years.

I had a 2001 Tundra and experienced the brake problem. As noted this was a problem and was corrected in the early 2003 MY. I don't think you need to be concerned about a problem that doesn't affect later models.

Let us know what you decide on.

Joe

It's a knowen fact even with the new updates on the 03 on which my Tundra has on as well these problem's still occure.The Tundra has a pretty good stoping distance however they still have reported problems on brakes having vibes and wheel outset issues just comman knowledge coming from this truck beyond that something we can live with. The pad's really dont last long on this truck either expect to see one year of use (around 25k a year on miles i put on mine)..I have talked with many owner's including another 03 Tundra owner In atlanta and we all agree Brakes on the Tundra take a hand's down
Reply With Quote