View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09-24-2006, 08:26 PM
Tennesseestorm's Avatar
Tennesseestorm Tennesseestorm is offline
Veteran Member
 
My Garage
N/A
My Details
Last Online: 08-04-2009 08:26 PM
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Northeast Tennessee
Age: 33
Posts: 885
Rep Power: 8
Tennesseestorm is on a distinguished road.
Tennesseestorm's Photo Albums
Default Re: 91' Land Cruiser - considering - any issues?

Oh thanks. I guess mine was just the exception rather than the rule, because my 5M-GE engine in my old 81' Cressida had blown a head gasket and was burning oil. No doubt these are good engines. I drove it for thousands of miles with a BHG and did not even know it at the time. Also- it still ran very smoothly and powerful. I miss that old car- it was otherwise in EC and seemed to be bulletproof and built like a mini-tank.

I am still considering a Land Cruiser, but probably a 95+ model, to get the airbags. Considering other Toyotas as well, such as Tacomas, Tundras and even T100. Thanks again!

Quote:
Originally Posted by CACressida View Post
Actually, the 2.8L I-6 5M-GE/5M-Es were very reliable and didn't burn oil. Its the 7M-GE 3.0L found in the last generation Cressidas and the Mk3 Supras that has the headgasket problems wich is where the oil burning comes from.

The 7M-GE is a terrific motor, it just has that lil headgasket problem wich can be prevented. RE-torque the head to 75 ft lbs. I did this on all my Cressidas. My oldest Cressida has 239k miles with no problems. The rest are all young in the 140-190k mile ranges and no hg signs.

So the bhg problem was only in the 3.0L 7M series engine wich was caused from a under-torqued head.
Reply With Quote