Thread: 96/97 LC or LX
View Single Post
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 07-18-2007, 07:36 PM
firetruck41's Avatar
firetruck41 firetruck41 is offline
Registered Member
 
My Garage
firetruck41's Photo Albums
Last Online: 09-21-2008 12:46 AM
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: SW Washington State
Age: 35
Posts: 554
Rep Power: 7
firetruck41 is on a distinguished road.
Default Re: 96/97 LC or LX

Joe, your so full of crap it's not even funny. I guess if you believe a Camry can go the same place as Cruiserdan did in that picture, then we are indeed in different worlds, and yours is not reality. I suspect you know that a Camry could not do that, but are you just used to making stuff up or bending the truth to fit your needs. First of all, your 80 series does not have an inline V-6, as you posted, it has an inline 6; your 95 80 series will not become a 20 year old vehicle if you sold it, it would still be just a 12 year old vehicle; a well modified 80 series LC can cost much less than 21k, depending on the users needs; the pics have a lot more than slick rock at moab; the 80 is not big and heavy, as compared to a Tundra, other than an 80 being ~2 inches taller and ~100lbs heavier, the Tundra is bigger (obviously); a 2.5-3" lift is ~$800, a 4" lift is less than $2k, you can go bigger and spend more money if you like; any vehicle used offroad will require a couple hundred dollars a year in maintenance...
An 80 series does not make a good rock buggy, but replacing a Tundra for offroad use? Yeah it can do that, except for the big bed.
__________________
Ben
1996 Lexus LX450, 129k, front/rear factory locking differentials, Cooper STT 285s, OME 850/863 suspension lift, CDL/Pin 7, 30qt freezer, 2@aux fuse blocks, aux powerpoint, 850w inverter
1998 Lexus LX470, 139k- SOLD
1993 Land Cruiser, 198k- SOLD
Reply With Quote