Thread: Yokohama vs BFG
View Single Post
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-04-2002, 11:48 PM
toy4play's Avatar
toy4play toy4play is offline
toy4play
 
My Garage
N/A
My Details
Last Online: 07-26-2007 03:47 PM
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: San Diego, Ca.
Age: 47
Posts: 90
Rep Power: 8
toy4play is on a distinguished road.
toy4play's Photo Albums
Post Yokohama vs BFG

All this talk about Bridgestone AT this, MT that. What about Yokohama? I went tire shopping at tirerack.com , hmmmed and hawwed, looked and scratched and found the Yokohama Geolander AT II (285/75R-16). Very agressive looking tread pattern, quiet on the road (as compared to the stock Dunlops), great traction. tirerack has a rating system to compare tires and the Yokahama ranked head to head with the BFG AT. The only knock I could find was treadwear, but hey, 40,000 mi waranty. What sold me was the price. $104.00 vs $159.00 for the BFG's. Yowza!!
__________________
Total Chaos upper "A" arms, Off Road Solutions hub conversion, Sway-A-Way (racerunner) coilovers w/ 3" lift, 1 1/4" Rancho rear blocks, Downey Headers, Flowmaster 40 series, MT Wheels, 285/75R-16 Nitto terra grapplers, clear corner front lenses, skid row skid plate, Pioneer stereo, 8" CDT subwoofers
Reply With Quote