Quote:
Originally Posted by pagemaster
I am not too sure you know what you are really talking about here. The latest Motor Trend magazine just tested the Sequioa and Tahoe and others. While the Sequioa performed at .72g for lateral acceleration the Tahoe perform at .71g.
In fact. Motor trend reports that the Ford truck is at .68g
A couple years ago the Range Rover HSE and LX470 tied for .68g on the lateral skidpad.
a few years back. Motor Trend tested a solid axle Sequioa with a .71g lateral skidpad whereas this latest test has the Sequioa at .72g. Not much better.
|
Page, looks like you're off the reservation again. At least you never give up. Lateral skidpads scores have nothing to do with passenger comfort. I suppose if you were planning to take a shot at the 24 LeMans it might make a difference, but we were talking about passenger comfort. An IRS will always win out as a more comfortable ride for passengers.
Why do you think every luxury suvs and passenger car has an IRS except for your beloved LC/LX platform? Couldn't be because Toyota is milking a old platform for every $ they can get before retiring it...nah couldn't be?
Want to take another shot and explaining to everyone why the LC/LX platform is the last 30 yr old design on the planet other than the GM twins that haven't upgraded their rear suspension? I can't wait to hear your next explanation.