Tundra Solutions Logo

Go Back   Tundra Solutions Forum > Technical & Vehicle Assistance Forums > Engine & Drivetrain

Readylift.com


Notices

Engine & Drivetrain Discussions about the engine and drivetrain of your vehicle.

This is a discussion thread titled "Supercharger Info - Please Read", within the Engine & Drivetrain forum, part of the Technical & Vehicle Assistance Forums category.


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-21-2003, 11:41 PM
bkoneski47's Avatar
Inactive Account
 
My Garage
bkoneski47's Photo Albums
Last Online: 06-27-2005 09:30 PM
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Billerica, MA
Age: 35
Posts: 207
Rep Power: 0
bkoneski47 is on a distinguished road.
Default Supercharger Info - Please Read

Carson City Toyota and Nashua Toyota (Nashua, NH) are the two biggest TRD dealers in the country. The other day, a rep at Nashua had informed me about some pretty interesting info about the Supercharger. There's been a lot of debate in these forums about the K&N FIPK as to if they are better or worse on the Tundra. They have a 2001 demo truck with the S.C. installed and originally had the stock airbox. They then put on the FIPK and had a noticable increase in performance. They even dyno'd it both ways, and the K&N proved to increase the HP. The reason TRD tells everyone to use the stock airbox is because that is the way it was designed to work with. The engineers at TRD never tried the FIPK. When the FIPK was installed with the S.C., people were producing more HP and torque, and breaking the rear axles. He also stated that new Tundra's coming out have a stronger rearend and TRD is going to make that generation Supercharger with 2 (that's right, TWO) supplemental fuel injectors. Again, all this is from a TRD rep, not myself. Please respond to whether this sounds believable or just BS.
Reply With Quote

  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-22-2003, 08:23 AM
kaosv1's Avatar
Registered Member
 
My Garage
Dealer : Elmhurst Toyota
2002 Toyota Tundra
kaosv1's Photo Albums
Last Online: 12-17-2007 11:37 AM
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Griswold, CT
Age: 49
Posts: 181
Rep Power: 7
kaosv1 is on a distinguished road.
Default YES......

Well mated to the (in developement) 5.8 liter it makes tremendous sense.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-23-2003, 01:31 PM
RLloyd's Avatar
Registered Member
 
My Garage
Dealer : Phil Wright Toyota
2001 Toyota Land Cruiser Wife,
2003 Toyota Corolla,
2007 Toyota Tundra Crew Max, 4x4,TRD,22
RLloyd's Photo Albums
Last Online: 11-20-2008 02:17 PM
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 48
Rep Power: 0
RLloyd is on a distinguished road.
Default

Just what I was waiting for! I have had the TRD supercharger on my truck for just about 1-year now. I wanted to finish it off with the cold air kit from K&N but I too was told not to do it. They told me that the truck would not run correctly and that the mapping of the air reading would be effected by the tube. Does anyone else have this on there blown tundra???
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-23-2003, 05:59 PM
bkoneski47's Avatar
Inactive Account
 
My Garage
bkoneski47's Photo Albums
Last Online: 06-27-2005 09:30 PM
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Billerica, MA
Age: 35
Posts: 207
Rep Power: 0
bkoneski47 is on a distinguished road.
Default

To clear that up for you, he said that the only problem with the FIPK was that sometimes K&N's oil had been being deposited on the MAF sensors wire, causing a misreading by the computer. If you don't over oil the filter and/or periodically clean the tiny wire inside the MAF with a gentle spray electrical cleaner, then you should be all set.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-25-2003, 04:09 AM
Registered Member
 
My Garage
Dealer : Jim Lynch Toyota
2006 Toyota Tacoma
Mudog715's Photo Albums
Last Online: 06-19-2007 10:02 PM
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Mesa, AZ
Age: 39
Posts: 219
Rep Power: 7
Mudog715 is on a distinguished road.
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by bkoneski47
To clear that up for you, he said that the only problem with the FIPK was that sometimes K&N's oil had been being deposited on the MAF sensors wire, causing a misreading by the computer. If you don't over oil the filter and/or periodically clean the tiny wire inside the MAF with a gentle spray electrical cleaner, then you should be all set.
Actually the "early" design FIPK for the Tundra had a problem with inaccurate MAF readings because of the tube diameter difference from stock. The MAF sensor doesn't read ALL of the air passing through the tube, just a small sample. Then it extrapolates that sample, ie if the sample size is 1/10 the tube size then it multiplies the sampled airflow by 10 and uses that as the total airflow value. The problem is if the tube diameter where the MAF is sampling differs from stock (or what the MAF was calibrated to), then the MAF will report incorrect readings -- ie. if the tube is LARGER and the MAF is maybe only sampling 1/11 of the total air, it's still multiplying by 10 (not 11 as it "should"). The result is less airflow reported to the ECU and the ECU commanding too lean of an air-fuel ratio as a result. The ECU will "learn" the error and attempt to compensate, however if the level of compensation (long term fuel trim) exceeds about 10% from the factory calibration, the ECU will assume either the MAF or an O2 sensor is reporting incorrect values and the Check Engine will illuminate. Even if it is under the 10% limit, tip-in enrichment will be off resulting in a bog off idle or when rapidly opening the throttle.

The "revised" FIPK tube has a little "crimp" in it directly below the MAF to reduce the pipe size to similar to the stock pipe. This keeps the MAF in calibration and prevents the problems discussed above from occurring.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 05-25-2003, 08:35 PM
Registered Member
 
My Garage
Dealer : Carson Toyota Scion
2006 Toyota Tundra
hyrlik's Photo Albums
Last Online: 11-18-2008 11:02 PM
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Age: 29
Posts: 90
Rep Power: 7
hyrlik is on a distinguished road.
Send a message via ICQ to hyrlik Send a message via AIM to hyrlik Send a message via MSN to hyrlik Send a message via Yahoo to hyrlik
Default

Can you post the dyno numbers with and without?

I still haven't seen anyone post a dyno slip/jpeg, and I don't want to go through the 60+ pages of posts in the S/C bible looking for one...
__________________
--
Michal Hyrlik - I do whatever my rice crispies tell me to do...
2004 Cobra Coupe - Full MM Setup - Whipple @ 15psi - 561.9whp 520.2rwtq The Dyno The Beast

2006 Toyota Tundra Double Cab The Daily
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 05-27-2003, 08:52 PM
Registered Member
 
My Garage
Dealer : Nye Frontier Toyota/Scion
2003 Toyota Tundra
UCK40's Photo Albums
Last Online: 10-21-2008 09:18 PM
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Anchorage, AK
Age: 34
Posts: 98
Rep Power: 6
UCK40 is on a distinguished road.
Default

03 4.7 SUPERCHARGERS HAVE "TWO" "NINTH" INJECTORS
BY ALL THE POSTS ON THE 03 SUPERCHARGER, IT ISNT HELPING OUT TOO MUCH
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:53 AM.


TundraSolutions.com is a registered trademark of Tundra Solutions, Inc.
Other trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of the TundraSolutions.com User Agreement and Privacy Policy.