Re: Rhino-Liner vs. Speedliner opinions (No Line-x)
Again, you're a Qwikliner dealer. Thanks for the pics though. We now can compare Qwikliner's low pressure to a high pressure bedliner. Which one looks better to you?
Re: Rhino-Liner vs. Speedliner opinions (No Line-x)
I have reason to believe that that's not a true statement, because you have appeared on other sites stating that you have been either "using" or "spraying Qwikliner " for five years (sometimes three years, sometimes two years). I know you're the same person/persons because you are posting the same pics and you tend to have spelling and grammar errors.
I also think that there several of you that are in cahoots and your names are John Rider, Brenda Marlow, Eric Wander, Paul Harris, Paul Smith, Jose, Jessica Smith, Richard Newman, and Bill McConway. At least some of you are located in Houston which is where Ulimate Linings (makes Qwikliner) office is located. You obviously are Paul Smith. However, many times, these people post from the same computer, so maybe you are just ONE person using multiple names, which is probably the case because the ALL have grammar/spelling errors.
Re: Rhino-Liner vs. Speedliner opinions (No Line-x)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 123Gone
I have reason to believe that that's not a true statement, because you have appeared on other sites stating that you have been either "using" or "spraying Qwikliner " for five years (sometimes three years, sometimes two years). I know you're the same person/persons because you are posting the same pics and you tend to have spelling and grammar errors.
I also think that there several of you that are in cahoots and your names are John Rider, Brenda Marlow, Eric Wander, Paul Harris, Paul Smith, Jose, Jessica Smith, Richard Newman, and Bill McConway. At least some of you are located in Houston which is where Ulimate Linings (makes Qwikliner) office is located. You obviously are Paul Smith. However, many times, these people post from the same computer, so maybe you are just ONE person using multiple names, which is probably the case because the ALL have grammar/spelling errors.
low pressure have their own Advantages See the advantage of catridge based sytem /qwikliner. Qwikliner1 Easy to install customer can do .2 Environmentally Friendly Spray 3 Prices are half than others4 Spray bedliner within 15 minutes, after that customer can use the vehicle.5 Save money, save time6 Low maintenance cost. low labour cost.High pressure Bedliner1 Not environment friendly2 Hard to install .Customers can't do.3 Cost are high4 At least take 6-8 hours 5 Time and money consuming6 High maintenance and labour cost.You showed me the picture of material gouped on .It is due to bad installation not due to bedliner quality.Qwikliner is like family truck bedliner doctor.
Re: Rhino-Liner vs. Speedliner opinions (No Line-x)
OK, Paul, you are the same person as John Rider, you just posted the same info on another forum.
Paul, the pictures of the Qwikliner Jeep are pictures that YOU posted on other forums!
LINE-X and Rhino (who together have about 50% of the market) both have cartridge based products similiar to Qwikliner and neither company recommends them for truck bedliners. Why? Because their high pressure products along with their application methods are significantly superior.
Now, the list that you posted about high pressure: How do you know anything about high pressure? You've never experienced it, so I don't think you would even know what things cost or otherwise. I can tell you that the high pressure information you listed is mostly incorrect. 6 to 8 hours! That's actually funny! I guarantee you a high pressure bedliner can be applied WAY faster than a low pressure bedliner.
Your list: Not environment friendly - Not true, most brands including LINE-X and Rhino are even EPA exempt!
2 Hard to install .Customers can't do. - It's not hard to install, but customers can't do it because they don't have the equipment. Well in order to apply Qwikliner, they will need the spray gun and an air compressor. That's going to be about $500 to $600.
3 Cost are high - Like what?
4 At least take 6-8 hours - HA! No, it takes about 2 hours for black.
5 Time and money consuming - I don't understand that comment.
6 High maintenance and labour cost. - Not true on both points.
Re: Rhino-Liner vs. Speedliner opinions (No Line-x)
123gone, it looks like you have caught someone. Their reply is just a cut and paste of company literature. If I was a liner dealer that was proud of my product, I would not hide behind fictitious names. They have lost any respect for their product. And this is from the person who is most vocal about the fact that there is market for all contenders.
Also I have a 2007 with the pneumatic tailgate. Goes up and down really easy, no effort. I opened a friend's tailgate that had a spray in liner and it weighed a ton. Will this wear out the tailgate faster?
Re: Rhino-Liner vs. Speedliner opinions (No Line-x)
Im also in the market for a spray in liner and would like to see this thread still going !!! Whats the average price you should expect to pay for a good liner, either rhino or Line x?