a rigeline is fine if you dont need it to be a truck ... if your only towing jet skis then your fine but any real towing and your over limit ... so in my eyes they are not even in the same class ...
You are absolutely right. They aren't. The Ridgeline is a mid-sized truck, and the Tundra is a FULL SIZED truck. That is why in my comparisons I mention the Tacoma more then the Tundra or other full sized trucks unless explaining the DIFFERENCES.
__________________
Is something supposed to be here?
Why do these threads always turn into "bash the competition" posts? The Ridgeline is a reasonable TRUCK that has a hybrid unibody/body on frame composition that tows less than a Tundra but hauls about the same. It rides substantially better - these were the trade-off engineers made.
I could say my Tundra is an SUV with a bed -- it's just a Sequoia with a bed, right?
Last edited by FlatironsDreamer; 11-04-2007 at 12:58 AM.
isolated,yes ,btu it happened.
I test drove many ridgelines, but it was to light for my towing needs,Otherwise I would have one. Tacomas tow 6500 androom to spare on gcvwr
The Ridgeline is a reasonable TRUCK that has a hybrid unibody/body on frame composition that tows less than a Tundra but hauls about the same.
Actually the Ridgeline box has a lot less volume than my Tundra,so it hauls a lot less of bulky materials.And with less ground clearance it won't go where my Tundra goes offroad.
Last edited by stubblejumper; 11-04-2007 at 01:38 AM.
isolated,yes ,btu it happened.
I test drove many ridgelines, but it was to light for my towing needs,Otherwise I would have one. Tacomas tow 6500 androom to spare on gcvwr
The Honda Ridgeline says, "5,000-lb. towing capacity (with towing package)"
FWIW... the Tundra long bed V6 is also rated for 5,000 lb.
AND ...the Ridgeway tailgate has a 300-lb. dynamic load capacity
I would rather have the Ridgeline over the Tacoma... I think it's a better deal..
Otis
It is 3500lbs for reg cab, access cab 2x4, and x-runner trim. All 4x4, pre-runner 2x4, and all double cab models, have a max tow capacity of 6500lbs.
Around here, that means most Tacos you see driving around have a 6500lb tow capacity.
I have a MDX, same platform as the Ridgeline, it is a great car!
__________________
Ben
1996 Lexus LX450, 129k, front/rear factory locking differentials, Cooper STT 285s, OME 850/863 suspension lift, CDL/Pin 7, 30qt freezer, 2@aux fuse blocks, aux powerpoint, 850w inverter
1998 Lexus LX470, 139k- SOLD
1993 Land Cruiser, 198k- SOLD
I would rather have the Ridgeline over the Tacoma... I think it's a better deal..
Otis
That was my conclusion after comparing the Tacoma and Ridgeline. I was on my way to buy a Tacoma but checked out the Ridgeline at the last minute. The Tacoma has the edge as far as off road ability goes, but the Ridgeline is just a more refined package all around. Traction system, 4ft between the wells, inbed trunk, 2 way opening gate, superior rear seating and cargo area, more refined interior. It was a pretty clear choice for my money.
But at least when you stomp on the gas in the Tacoma, it gets out of its own way! My Ridgeline was a pig and when it came to gas mileage, it was a hog! I can't understand that they put a 3.5L motor in it and it weighs some 4400lbs. It should have been more like a 4.7L.
Hey, if the guy honestly owned a Tundra and is now happier with the Ridgeline, good for him. But as for me and my house, we saw the light at the Toyota dealership and will never go back. In fact, after my experience with the RL, I seriously doubt I will ever own another Honda.
It is 3500lbs for reg cab, access cab 2x4, and x-runner trim. All 4x4, pre-runner 2x4, and all double cab models, have a max tow capacity of 6500lbs.
That just makes no sense to me .....
Same engines .... same transmissions .... But they can TOW3,000 pounds more ???
I know suspension makes some difference, but for me, the TOWING capabilities are primarily determined by the size of the engine, and how much the truck weighs, all by itself...
That just makes no sense to me .....
Same engines .... same transmissions .... But they can TOW3,000 pounds more ???
I know suspension makes some difference, but for me, the TOWING capabilities are primarily determined by the size of the engine, and how much the truck weighs, all by itself...
Otis
Extra cooling and charging capacity but I think the substantive difference is the class IV receiver on the towing package versus bumper mounted ball.
Congratulations on your new Ridgeline. I've had my Ridgeline since March 05 and I love it more everyday. It's been great in the sand and worst winter driving. It's one of the best thought out and functional layouts I've ever seen in any vehicle. It's the closest thing to an "all purpose" vehicle I can think of.
When Toyota gets all these bugs worked out, the Tundra will be one fine machine. I really wanted them to hit it out of the park with the new Tundra. I'm sure they'll get their quality where it needs to be in a year or two. It's just dumbfounding they've had the glitches they've had. They're just not the same bullet proof company they were when I bought my 91 Toy truck which still runs great. If they think they can still ride their past rep much further, they better think again.
That just makes no sense to me .....
Same engines .... same transmissions .... But they can TOW3,000 pounds more ???
I know suspension makes some difference, but for me, the TOWING capabilities are primarily determined by the size of the engine, and how much the truck weighs, all by itself...
Otis
the regular cabs and extended cabs in 2x4 NON Prerunner version dont have the 4.0, they have a 2.7 liter i think? and well, the X-Runner and towing should not be mentioned in the same sentence
The Honda Ridgeline says, "5,000-lb. towing capacity (with towing package)"
FWIW... the Tundra long bed V6 is also rated for 5,000 lb.
AND ...the Ridgeway tailgate has a 300-lb. dynamic load capacity
I would rather have the Ridgeline over the Tacoma... I think it's a better deal..
Otis
Some of the advantages of the 2008 Toyota Tacoma 4x4 Double-Cab 140.6" WB V6 (A5)
over the 2008 Honda Ridgeline 4x4 Crew Cab 122" WB LX (A5) are:
Capacities it has better fuel economy in the city (13.4 L/100km versus 14.4 L/100km) it has a greater towing capacity (2 948kg versus 2 268kg) it has more legroom in the front (1 060mm vs 1 036mm) it has a larger exterior cargo length (1 866mm versus 1 524mm) the exterior length is greater (5 621mm versus 5 253mm) Convenience it has a in-dash mounted 6-disc CD player it has steering wheel controls for the radio it has front lighter element(s) location Driveability it has double wishbone front suspension Exterior it has body-coloured door handles there is a higher class of trailering available (class IV versus class III) Interior it includes an auxiliary driver visor it includes an auxiliary passenger visor it has a leather steering wheel it has a telescoping steering wheel it has a cloth door trim insert it has a leather gear shift knob it includes a full floor console it has interior concealed storage it has rear door bins Off-Road the approach angle is greater (35 deg versus 25 deg) the departure angle is greater (25 deg versus 22 deg) Powertrain it has a larger engine (4.0L vs 3.5L) it has a more sophisticated valvetrain (DOHC vs SOHC) its engine has more torque (266 lb.-ft. @ 4 000 rpm vs 245 lb.-ft. @ 4 500 rpm) it has a HD alternator it has an engine oil cooler Seating it has lumbar support for the driver seat Wheels the wheelbase is greater (3 570mm versus 3 100mm) Wheels & Tires it has machined wheels it has wider tires (265mm versus 245mm) it has a full-size spare tire
from canadian side
Re: Sold my Tundra
it has better fuel economy in the city (13.4 L/100km versus 14.4 L/100km) 
Linear Mode
