You are also comparing a Reg cab to a quad cab Ram. A S/C DBL cab or a Crew max compared to the Ram Quad Cab is a better comparison. It would be fun race to see. Toyota has a huge benefit with the 6 spd tranny, but with that much power it could also hurt your chances at getting the power to the ground, unless you are a 4x4.
lightning does it w/ 1 less hp than Tundras.but of course both trucks are lighter than a quad cab srt10.
Of course I'm talking about a s/c RCSB now a 4 doors s/c Tundra against a stock 4 doors srt10.. well we will have to wait and see..... also... 4 doors s/c Tundras will have to run 13.4 or faster to beat a quad cab srt10 w/ stage 2 pcm... not saying that it's not posible.
There's a guy on this forum that has a DC and ran a 13.7 with the s/c. I dunno if that's the best that can be done but that's all we have to go by right now
ET Calculator
That's kind of a nice little sh*ts and giggles website to look at to see what you might be close to, ET wise. Insert RWHP. A supercharged DC 4x4 should be somewhere in the mid-13s, especially with some exhaust work.
There is a guy I ran into around here with a stock '04 quad cab SRT-10. I talked with him for about ten minutes, and we agreed we should race once I get mine all hooked up with the blower. I don't know how much he weighs, but I'd imagine it's close to 5000 lbs. So we shall see! I'll report back when I run into him again.
__________________
'08 5.7 TRD SR5 4X4 DC, Supercharged, Banks Monster single, Black Limited 20s, Line-X
also... 4 doors s/c Tundras will have to run 13.4 or faster to beat a quad cab srt10 w/ stage 2 pcm... not saying that it's not posible.
I think its realistic - especially with exhaust work. Not to mention headers, tune, etc. - which may be a little unfair if the Dodge just has a PCM tune.
You have to admit, that's pretty impressive for a 4x4 DC truck...Now can it go around corners the same as the Dodge??? Probably not...
There is a guy I ran into around here with a stock '04 quad cab SRT-10. I talked with him for about ten minutes, and we agreed we should race once I get mine all hooked up with the blower. I don't know how much he weighs, but I'd imagine it's close to 5000 lbs. So we shall see! I'll report back when I run into him again.
I would vote closer to 6000 lbs. I have not seen them better than 14s stock.
hello guys srt10 owner here..... I'm new here and my name is Raul.
don't want to star any trouble here but looks like some of you have very high expectations.... I'm not saying Tundras are not fast... because they are especialy the rc. some of them are runnig very low 14's... haven't see a video of them running 13's and if some of you do congrats..... but to say that the 4 doors tundra can keep up w/ a 4 doors srt10 stock for stock is not credible.... now a I think a rc tundra can run door to door w/ a stock 4 doors srt10... but if the quad cab srt10 has the stage 2 pcm you will get beat....
now agains a rc srt10.. there are still a lot of bed drivers driving them so is more probable that you beat a rc srt10 than a qc w/ stage 2 pcm....
heres a video of my qc w/ stage 2.. weigh of the truck w/ me in it close to 6000 pounds. o5 are a little faster because they weigh less than 06. most of them w/ the stage 2 will run 12.9 in a good day.
my truck stock run 13.8 all day long....
now I'm pretty sure a supercharged rc tundra will destroy a stock qc srt10.
DJ - I know you are calling me out in my OP since I said my DC hung with a RCSB from 60-95 and only lost by 1.5 truck lengths at the end. Enough with the magazine racing bull****, why is this so impossible?
Let me help you with some math that you may not be capable of considering. Take a stock truck that runs high 13's in the 1/4 versus a truck that runs mid to low 14's in the quarter - lets say .5 seconds difference at the end of 1320 ft. At the speed that you should be trapping (~100 mph), thats only about 150 ft/sec and at 0.5 seconds, you got 75 feet on me. Thats less than 4 truck lengths.
Now, lets narrow this window from 0-100 mph down to 60-115 mph run. 1.5 trucks isnt so hard to fathom, is it? He punched it first, I hit it very shortly thereafter (anticipating him going for it) and had the advantage of better gearing at that speed despite the fact that he downshifted first. I held him until i topped out that particular gear. He then proceeded to pull on me 1.5 truck lengths until my top speed limiter kicked in. Was he tuned? I doubt it...I dont care about Stage 2 such-and-such, now you are comparing apples to oranges...hell the whole comparison is apples to oranges.
Now, I ask you again, is it impossible? Absolutely not. I was there, you werent. You cannot tell me that I'm not credible if you did not witness the whole thing.
Racing from a dig at a drag strip is one thing....racing on the highway is a completely different scenario. That being said, I dont drive the drag strip on a daily basis, but I do drive the highway. I would prefer my lower horsepower, better gearing and far superior gas mileage pickup to a supertruck that really had to work for what he got vs a pickup with 100 less hp and slightly more weight.
Thats ends today's lesson. Thanks for playing.
__________________
Mine: 2007 Tundra Double Cab, 5.7L, slate, 4x2, Flowmaster 50 series dual in/dual out, Homemade leveling kit (2.5"), black headlight mod, white LED gauges, custom 8" Sub enclosure
Hers: 2007 Tahoe LTZ, Gold Mist Met., 5.3, 4x2, Nav
Previous Vehicles:
1990 Jeep Wrangler Islander, Rancho Lift
1992 Chevrolet Silverado Z71 4x4 RCSB - 190,000 miles and still running strong when I sold it.
2001 Honda Magna VF750
2002 Chevrolet Tahoe Z71
2006 Chevrolet Trailblazer SS (8.9 sec 1/8 mile - STOCK)
2007 Tundra Double Cab, TRD 4x2, 4.7L, desert sand
DJ - I know you are calling me out in my OP since I said my DC hung with a RCSB from 60-95 and only lost by 1.5 truck lengths at the end. Enough with the magazine racing bull****, why is this so impossible?
Let me help you with some math that you may not be capable of considering. Take a stock truck that runs high 13's in the 1/4 versus a truck that runs mid to low 14's in the quarter - lets say .5 seconds difference at the end of 1320 ft. At the speed that you should be trapping (~100 mph), thats only about 150 ft/sec and at 0.5 seconds, you got 75 feet on me. Thats less than 4 truck lengths.
Now, lets narrow this window from 0-100 mph down to 60-115 mph run. 1.5 trucks isnt so hard to fathom, is it? He punched it first, I hit it very shortly thereafter (anticipating him going for it) and had the advantage of better gearing at that speed despite the fact that he downshifted first. I held him until i topped out that particular gear. He then proceeded to pull on me 1.5 truck lengths until my top speed limiter kicked in. Was he tuned? I doubt it...I dont care about Stage 2 such-and-such, now you are comparing apples to oranges...hell the whole comparison is apples to oranges.
Now, I ask you again, is it impossible? Absolutely not. I was there, you werent. You cannot tell me that I'm not credible if you did not witness the whole thing.
Racing from a dig at a drag strip is one thing....racing on the highway is a completely different scenario. That being said, I dont drive the drag strip on a daily basis, but I do drive the highway. I would prefer my lower horsepower, better gearing and far superior gas mileage pickup to a supertruck that really had to work for what he got vs a pickup with 100 less hp and slightly more weight.
Thats ends today's lesson. Thanks for playing.
First... I din't call anyone out
second... I was comparing stock qc srt10 (4 doors) vs 4 doors tundra and I think is call crew max not double cab like the 1 you drive.
third.. you said you raced a rc srt10 not a qc srt10
fourth... on your numbers..I think you are saying that rc srt10 run high 13's... but they run from 13.5 to 12.99 w/ a bad driver they will run 20's.
fifth.... driving highways on our daily basis means that we don't need to be a pro to drive a 6 spped 500hp truck.
also I don't think lenghs on a 1/4 mile race have something to do w/ lenghts on a highway race... different start speeds... different scenarios....
this is a video of me running 13.3 in columbus ohio on a hot summer day... don't know the DA.
second race black truck.
pd. I don't think a rc srt10 is only .5 sec faster than your truck.... thats magazine bull$%^&.
have a nice day Sr.
Double cab Tundra is the same size as the 4 door dodge cab. The crewmax is a whole nother animal, and is the same size as a dodge MegaCab.
__________________ 2008 Tundra CrewMax Limited 4x4 5.7, White w/ oak leather, Moonroof, NAV, Factory 20's, XM.
2006 Nissan Murano SE Black, Loaded, Black leather, 20" Dubs
2005 Corvette C6 (#581) Coupe 6 spd Black, Loaded, Black Leather, Navigation, XM, Onstar, HUD, F55 Magnetic ride, Z51 Brakes/calipers/sway-bars, Route 66 Exhaust, Intake, Custom Tune, 160 stat. Only 2 runs at the track...12.4s @116mph
It does not matter who is faster. Some one, something will always be faster! It all depends on who has the fattest pockets. All and all they are both bad *** trucks, one was made to be a sport truck and the other was made to be a work truck. If Toyota was making the tundra a sport truck, it would have come with the supercharger and all the other TRD stuff staight from the factory. Put more money into ether one and they are going to be faster then what they were stock, but it just depends on how much your willing to spend.
Re: Supercharged Tundra Vs. SRT-10
Linear Mode
