One thing I just noticed - Look how small the pulley is on the supercharger. Doesn't look like you could make it much smaller to add extra boost. TRD probably did this on purpose...
When I went from 3" to 2.825 I gained 3 psi in perfect conditions....so there is much to be gained from very small decreases in pulley size
__________________
. 2007 TUNDRA 5.7L SR5 TRD 4x2 Double Cab, Salsa Red Pearl
TRD CAI, Corsa Sport Side Exit Dual Tip Exhaust, Stebel 300Hz Air Horn, OEM Tundra Mud Mats, Black powder-coated side-step bars, Ventshades, Line-X, TRD Sway Bar, Blacked headlights surround, White LED guage and dash lights, Viper 771VXR Remote Start / Alarm, Carriage Works black billet grille with logo remount (awaiting install).
Last edited by HotWheelsUMD; 11-11-2008 at 06:01 PM.
Reason: fixed link, thanks super werty
Although I'll admit that 4.4s seems a bit quick, its entirely conceivable that its physically possible. As mentioned, the only problem is traction. I'm amazed they were able to perfect the launch such that they could repeat these times.
RCSB SRT-10 Ram (500hp/525tq) - 5100 lbs 0-60 in 4.8s (per Wikipedia - can't find any other/better info)
RCSB 5.7L Tundra (500hp/550tq) - 4910 lbs 0-60 in 4.4s*
*Even with a .3 second delay due to rollout (not even sure if MT measures 0-60 this way or not) its as fast or faster than the Ram.
So <-----------------SRT-10 Owners (Yes I know its not apples-apples but we still do it for cheaper!!)
Its funny because now you have these mag-racers and bench-racers with $5000 into their srt-4 neon with the stock turbo and they're pissed because our trucks can smoke them with a load full of boxes in the back.
I'd bet big moneyif Autoblog or whoever these jokers are get their hands on a S/C Tundra they'll conveniently run 5 flat times and say, "See, we didn't think so" Even though I'm not the biggest fan of MT or any of the car mags for that matter, I don't think they have anything to lie about...
Although I'll admit that 4.4s seems a bit quick, its entirely conceivable that its physically possible. As mentioned, the only problem is traction. I'm amazed they were able to perfect the launch such that they could repeat these times.
RCSB SRT-10 Ram (500hp/525tq) - 5100 lbs 0-60 in 4.8s (per Wikipedia - can't find any other/better info)
RCSB 5.7L Tundra (500hp/550tq) - 4910 lbs 0-60 in 4.4s*
*Even with a .3 second delay due to rollout (not even sure if MT measures 0-60 this way or not) its still faster than the Ram.
So <-----------------SRT-10 Owners (Yes I know its not apples-apples but we still do it for cheaper!!)
Its funny because now you have these mag-racers and bench-racers with $5000 into their srt-4 neon with the stock turbo and they're pissed because our trucks can smoke them with a load full of boxes in the back.
I'd bet big moneyif Autoblog or whoever these jokers are get their hands on a S/C Tundra they'll conveniently run 5 flat times and say, "See, we didn't think so" Even though I'm not the biggest fan of MT or any of the car mags for that matter, I don't think they have anything to lie about...
Some of these sites test 0 - 60 mph just by visually watching the speedo, not sure if thats what happend here.
Every Srt Neon Owner I have seen on the net always leaves the "neon" out of there vehicle signiture, and just calls there car a "SRT 4". Sad really.
__________________ 2008 Tundra CrewMax Limited 4x4 5.7, White w/ oak leather, Moonroof, NAV, Factory 20's, XM.
2006 Nissan Murano SE Black, Loaded, Black leather, 20" Dubs
2005 Corvette C6 (#581) Coupe 6 spd Black, Loaded, Black Leather, Navigation, XM, Onstar, HUD, F55 Magnetic ride, Z51 Brakes/calipers/sway-bars, Route 66 Exhaust, Intake, Custom Tune, 160 stat. Only 2 runs at the track...12.4s @116mph
Some of these sites test 0 - 60 mph just by visually watching the speedo, not sure if thats what happend here.
Every Srt Neon Owner I have seen on the net always leaves the "neon" out of there vehicle signiture, and just calls there car a "SRT 4". Sad really.
A co-worker/ friend has one of those SRT-4 Neon's and readily admits that he'll get spanked by an EVO or STi. It is a fast car stock, no doubt about it but, I grew up street racing with AWD Eclipses that destroyed Corvettes and Mustangs. I have come to learn that anything with boost going to all four wheels is going to be a rocket and hard to beat. I have a built all motor Integra and don't usually go the boost route but, this TRD Supercharger will be under my hood one of these days. Can't wait to smoke my brother's Dmax even more...
Some of these sites test 0 - 60 mph just by visually watching the speedo, not sure if thats what happend here.
Every Srt Neon Owner I have seen on the net always leaves the "neon" out of there vehicle signiture, and just calls there car a "SRT 4". Sad really.
A guy in a car club out my way finally got so mad with me calling his SRT-4 a neon that he got out his owner's manual to show me that Dodge never once calls the SRT-4 a neon. Hahahaha. It just made me call it a skittle car that much more.
I wouldn't think much. You can slap on a supercharger but I'm guessing if you run it hard you're going to have transmission problems. Just look at the transmission issues with factory power lol.
I'd bet big moneyif Autoblog or whoever these jokers are get their hands on a S/C Tundra they'll conveniently run 5 flat times and say, "See, we didn't think so" Even though I'm not the biggest fan of MT or any of the car mags for that matter, I don't think they have anything to lie about...
I guess I should have said they'll conveniently run 5.2's...
Re: 13.0s @ 106.3 MPH. Motor Trend Tundra.
<-----------------SRT-10 Owners (Yes I know its not apples-apples but we still do it for cheaper!!)
I believe M/T this thing is a rocket!
Linear Mode
