I was reading in motor trend and they said Toyota is thinking about a Toyota pickup smaller than the Tacoma , has anyone else herd about it or is it just M/T toying with us 2006 January/ February Auto News Edition - News Front - Truck Trend News
Have you seen IZUZUS latest "truck" UGLY in my opinion.I would like one as big as my 1985 and 86 , I could go anywhere with that it was the perfect size . I am about to the point of not caring who makes a small pickup ,even KIA or Hyundai
so long as its small . I kind of hope KIA or Hyundai dont under cut Toyota and make a small truck but if they do then off I go. although I dont know if I would trust a Hyundai or KIA pickup in the places I have been
You would think in Vermont they would allow them to be street legal, or at least on roads short of the interstate. This state is so fracked up its not funny. It would be handy to have a street legal rig like that, or one of the other UTV, fit it with tracks or tires depending on the season and terrain, plow, trailer.I don't know about being street legal in all states. I live in South Mississippi, pretty much anything goes here. There's a guy at my school with a Chevy Z71 lifted so high it makes 44" Boggers look tiny.
Interesting point; I bought my '05 b/c the '04 was smaller than I wanted, and a mid-size suited me better.I deliberately bought a 2004 rather than a 2005 based largely on the size issue.
Maybe, but there is not much difference in fuel mileage between the two models. And if it becomes a serious issue, those who must have a pickup will buy a new, much more efficient truck -- which will be available at that time. Those who do not need a truck will buy a small car, which is much, much more fuel efficient than any truck.EnolaGaia said:I think the main motivations for a smaller pickup vehicle are pretty clear: (a) the fuel situation (which will only get tighter over the coming years)
Keep in mind that the "fuel issue" is a moot point when considering the '04s over the '05's. These trucks weigh the same roughly, and the '05's engine is a more efficient design to boot. The current Tacoma access cab V6 4x4 (3950 pounds) has the same weight as my 1993 Toyota xtra cab pickup V6 4x4 (3950 pounds).I deliberately bought a 2004 rather than a 2005 based largely on the size issue. If I had to replace my truck right now I'd have serious issues with accepting the size of the current Tacomas. That's just me ...
I think the main motivations for a smaller pickup vehicle are pretty clear: (a) the fuel situation (which will only get tighter over the coming years) and (b) the fact that market segment is empty of offerings (save for the ancient Ford Ranger).
The 2005+ generation is heavier than the 2001 - 2004 generation by hundreds of pounds in all categories.The current Tacoma access cab V6 4x4 (3950 pounds) has the same weight as my 1993 Toyota xtra cab pickup V6 4x4 (3950 pounds). ...
Not sure about Toyota, but India manufacturer Mahindra (they sell tractors here in the USA) plans to import an SUV and compact truck in 2008. Surf their website and they have some pretty cool trucks!!!
mahindra.com: Mahindra Sona Ltd.
A Diesel swap involves a hell of a lot more money than if you bought a truck that is manufactured with one. IF it was a $4000-5000 option on a compact truck to have a small diesel, to do a swap, would be as much or more, and you don't have a factory warranty, and you don't have the peace of mind that it is built to work with the truck. Plus you gotta find/outsource a diesel, which can be tough to find, and often times it won't be a Toyota diesel, which I would prefer if I wanted a compact truck with a Diesel, because Toyota knows a thing or two about diesels. Also, every and any swap almost always involves some consequences, or something you may have to deal with or have a recurring issue with. Please keep in mind that we also are talking about new compact trucks. A lot of guys on other yota discussion boards I frequent have iterated their same thoughts on yearning for a small diesel for a Toyota compact truck. The economy would be nothing short of amazing I would imagine, the maintenance, the relaiblity, even more so than their current gas engines. It would honestly be a win-win situation for a lot of people. The torque downlow for offroading too...simply awesome.For those that want a diesel (yuck!) powered pickup, why dont you just do a engine swap... theres half cuts here, should have all the electronics, efi, etc that you need to get it going.
http://www.jarcoinc.com/inventory/halfcuts/
How does US emission standard compare with EU and Japan?We ARE better than everyone else. If you think that's arrogant, just go live someplace else for a while- you'll come around(unless your french). I've owned 3 diesels and unless your pulling a huge load, they're NOT worth the extra trouble. Period. They use them in the rest of the world because we're the only ones that care enough about polution to set meaningful emission standards(which 99% of the worlds diesels won't meet).
I may be incorrect, but isnt the diesel sold in Europe a higher quality kind than ours?"because we have this err of we're better than everyone in North America, this prohibits guys from enjoying diesels in compact trucks here in North America? give me a break."
We ARE better than everyone else. If you think that's arrogant, just go live someplace else for a while- you'll come around(unless your french). I've owned 3 diesels and unless your pulling a huge load, they're NOT worth the extra trouble. Period. They use them in the rest of the world because we're the only ones that care enough about polution to set meaningful emission standards(which 99% of the worlds diesels won't meet).
You are correct -- European diesel has a much lower sulphur content than our fuel.I may be incorrect, but isnt the diesel sold in Europe a higher quality kind than ours?
Check this website:How does US emission standard compare with EU and Japan?
Something's finally being done after repeated delays caused by oil and trucking company lobbying ...You are correct -- European diesel has a much lower sulphur content than our fuel.
I have read that something is being done about the high sulphur levels here, but I can't recall what it is.