Toyota Tundra Forums banner
1 - 20 of 20 Posts

· Premium Member
Joined
·
1,735 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Font Logo Automotive exterior Vehicle Graphics
Last year the California Air Research Board or CARB approved their new air quality standards, which will go into effect in 2017. This year the Environmental Protection Agency or EPA proposed their new fuel efficiency standards, which are expected to become law and go into effect also in 2017.

These two changes alone will put an end to the gas gulping 5.7L V8 equipped Tundra. Whether you drive a 4x2 5.7L V8 or the 4x4 5.7L V8, neither drivetrain is capable of meeting the newly proposed fuel efficiency standards. Therefore Toyota has to make some changes, and obviously they’ll have to do it soon.

Toyota however may not want to give up on the 5.7L V8 just yet, and could possibly assemble it solely for export. That’s right, the Tundra, which is assembled in San Antonio, Texas, may be built entirely as an export. I’ve learned that engineering the Tundra as a right hand drive pickup is not that difficult to do.

Earlier this year at the Chicago auto show Mike Sweers, the chief engineer for the Toyota Tundra and Tacoma vehicle programs, told an Australian automotive media magazine that it would be possible to build the Tundra in right-hand drive.

“Well of course it’s possible to change it to right-hand drive, we do that for some of our export vehicles now,” Sweers said.

“Right-hand drive, left-hand drive is not that difficult to switch. The biggest difficulty is re-engineering the instrument panel.”

When the new EPA fuel efficiency standards are signed into law this year Automakers like Toyota must also consider their own CAFÉ standards. That’s right there’s another set of fuel efficiency standards that automakers have all agreed to uphold.

Back in July of 2011, President Obama announced an agreement with thirteen large automakers to increase overall corporate average fuel economy to 54.5 miles per gallon for all cars and light-duty trucks by model year 2025. He was joined by nearly all the automakers including Toyota, as well as the United Auto Workers (UAW), and the State of California, who were all participants in the deal signing. The agreement will result in new CAFE regulations beginning with model year 2017.

A new report out this week from Michael Sivak and Brandon Schoettle at the University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute compares the CAFE targets for new light-duty vehicles with the NHTSA estimates of what actually will be achieved by automakers. The NHTSA data indicates that the mileage performance projected to be achieved by model year 2025 is 46.2 miles per gallon, which is significantly below the CAFE target.
Text Blue Line Font Plot

The red-line is the projected growth in average fuel economy for all new cars and light passenger trucks in the U.S. The Blue line is the growth excluding different credits automakers are getting and is more reflective of real fuel economy improvement. Source: University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.

All these changes will leave automakers like Toyota with trucks like the Tundra scrambling to up their MPG numbers so they can improve their CAFÉ numbers. One idea floating around would be to begin exporting the Tundra to other markets and later drop it from the American market entirely.

The pickup could be replaced in North America with a more fuel efficient full-sized pickup likely with a hybrid powertrain that meets the new, more stringent fuel efficiency standards. After-all we all know Toyota has abandoned the attempt to be class leading, so it seems to make more sense to produce something new from scratch.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
1,370 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
3,008 Posts
stupid greeny freaks
 

· Registered
Joined
·
652 Posts
eventually the future of trucks in america will have to be tacoma sized. people will hate it, but they will have to just make the tacoma a true 1/2 ton strength frame and keep a V6
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
1,370 Posts
eventually the future of trucks in america will have to be tacoma sized. people will hate it, but they will have to just make the tacoma a true 1/2 ton strength frame and keep a V6
Boo, no thanks
 

· Registered
Joined
·
4,576 Posts
Someone recycled an article from the 70's when they said by the 80's we would all be pushed by 4 cyl power plants because gas would be $10 gallon.
Reading an fluff article by a person who knowledge of things automotive is how to make monthly payment, makes no sense.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
652 Posts
the price of gas hasn't exploded as predicted back then, but government regulations have increased exponentially in recent years.

seems like the solution is clean diesel cars and trucks on a widespread scale. yet that doesn't seem to be discussed or promoted by washington ever.

all these cafe standards will be a nice debate when union run GM can't meet the requirements and the union demands exemption for chevy trucks ;-P
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
196 Posts
This country is in serious trouble.....duh! My 2013, 5.7, 4X4, Platinum is now a year old and with just a tad over 4k on the odometer going to stay a garage queen. The hell with liberals, gas prices and the EPA! My truck is not for sale, is not debatable and will probably end up in some museum in another country reflecting what America "used to be."
 

· Registered
Joined
·
115 Posts
I don't know if this article was just to get folks worked up or what. The Tundra is the best there is. Period. So maybe Chevy's newest truck really does get better mileage (for now) but there is no way that Toyota won't find a way to build the full size truck even better then GM can. The Tundra is just a better product. I am thinking this year was a filler year while they get ready for a lot more aluminum usage, maybe use some carbon fiber, a diesel engine, and an 8-speed tranny for 2016. If GM can make a V8 engine get 25-MPG then you know Toyota has already come up with a way to get 26 MPG or more. I won't believe it is the end of the full size Tundra until I see an empty spot on the dealer lot where it used to sit.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
41 Posts
Hybrid Truck, hee, hee.

A hybrid truck! :) Ha, ha, ha, I can't quit laughing. Ain't no cowboy gonna be caught dead in one. It probably wouldn't pull the hat off your head unless the wind is blowing.:rolleyes:
 

· Registered
Joined
·
11 Posts
This is a silly article, the Tundra will not be going away. Toyota will find away to get the economy of the full size truck where it needs to be to pass the emissions standards.
I agree and besides, the penalty for NOT meeting CAFE standards is something like $55. per average MPG you are under the standard. Companies like Mercedes and BMW just add the penalty into the cost of doing business and I believe you will see more companies take this route IF they cannot sell enough 2.0 liter vehicles in their other models. Would I pay an extra (says its 15mpg less than it needs to be) $825. for a V8? You betcha. Do I think there are enough other people that will do the same? Yes, at least for the next 15 years. (With these new drivers using fancy exhaust tips and mufflers to make their Hondas faster though we that will pay extra money for a V8 might die out)
 

· Registered
Joined
·
10 Posts
I wouldn't mind have a hybrid truck to putt around the back roads silently looking and watching wildlife... and I am a country boy who traps/hunts/fishes.

Would like to see a solar panel on my big double cab roof too.

Seen a big SUV go bye silently in a parking lot one day, thought it was too cool.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,086 Posts
Gentlemen, allow me to educate you on how the world works. Its being proposed for 2017, after the next presidential election. Its done that way so the next president will have to make a decision. They will have to...

1) Follow the Socialist stupidity and crush the industry or just force them to pay the penalty (that is the real goal, screwing them out of money). It has nothing to do with fuel efficiency. Raise the goal so high no one can meet it so they'll have to pay more - perfect. Which choice with the criminal, liar Clinton choose. Hmmm? Or...

2) Watch the next non-Socialist president "postpone" the ridiculous standards and get slammed by the paid, useful idiots. Yes, they are all paid to make fools of themselves. You'll hear them on PMSNBC, whine about how the conservative hates the environment, wants us to breath dirty air, whatever the talking point is that day. Sadly there are quite a few low-information voters who will actually believe that. Which choice will Cruz or Paul choose? Hmmm?

Consider this a free service by bigMoney. Class is dismissed. :D
 

· Registered
Joined
·
31 Posts
Can anyone explain to me why Gm Ford Chrysler and now Nissan have diesel power trains....but Toyota, who has diesel trucks throughout the world, refuses to introduce product in North America??? I am beyond stunned that a global leader like Toyota insists on playing ugly sister in the North American truck market.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
82 Posts
I have been saying for a while that if Toyota wants to run besides Ford dodge and Chevy than Toyota needs to come out with a diesel engine with optional tow packages for heavier loads. The option of dual wheels or different differential gearing ratios and suspension. If Toyota would come up with something like that than I would definitely get a tundra mason dump. Toyota made a big deal about the new tundra's towing capacity but I went to a dealership and they told me that the new tundra's are not heavy duty enough for a dump body. I don't trust dodge transmissions or Ford quality at all. I have no complaints on Chevy but I love my Toyota's.

Sent from AutoGuide.com Free App
 
1 - 20 of 20 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top