This is my proof that the tundra 5.7 liter has a timing belt
Toyota engineers were smart enough to install a chain to spin the cams in the 381 HP 5.7L V8 motor. I love the no maintenance and durability of a chain driven camshaft. Yes, it's a DOHC design with a total of 16 intake and 16 exhaust valves, 32 valves total. Anyone who buys a new Tundra WITHOUT this jewel of an engine under the hood is crazy. That motor alone makes me want to purchase the truck. SWEEEEEET!!! This engine is Lexus smooooooooooth and blows away the competition.
![]()
yeah i agree, timming equipment isnt under the same load... so rubbers have a Life to them the chains do last longer in the engineI do not believe this correlates to timing chains/belts.
I don't know if the loads are similar, but you can bet that a timing chain will see some massive loads as a function of revving. For example, if you snap the throttle open in neutral, you can move from 1,000 to 3,000 rpm in less than 1 sec. That's a lot of force (f=ma).yeah i agree, timming equipment isnt under the same load... so rubbers have a Life to them the chains do last longer in the engine
That right there is just sick. I think it's official, rather than build up the 4.7, I'm gonna find a way to shoehorn a 460 drivetrain and computer in the 00. Be a few years, tho...Lexus and Toyota do share similar design's at times.The New Ls has the world's first 8 speed auto Transmission and who's to say that 8 speed will end up in a tundra very soon. About the 4.7liter and 5.7 liter there Both well made engines I can't find any fault on both . The Engine picture above was taken from Sano when we attended the Detroit auto show the display showed how the tundra was made and the part's lined up which set's them up vs the competition. I think it's funny how the Ram guy's looked at the Tundra Like Jeez they copied our front end design..
(picture in a few)
The picture below is the New Lexus Ls 460 8 speed transmission (as showen it's on gear number 1 on the display)
Well, you see, that's why they use hydraulic tensioners. The fact that guides wear and chains stretch necessitate the need for hydraulic chain tensioners. If all of these parts were static they could just use solid tensioners and never have to worry. Now, stretching like mad is an extreme overstatement for a chain. A timing chain stretches far, far less than a timing belt. Rubber versus steel, use some common sense man.When that chain stretches and wears out (all of them do) you'll wish you had a timing belt. The guides wear out. The chain tensioners go bad. Long chains in overhead cam V8's stretch like mad. They slap around like crazy after awhile. Not now............5 years from now.
Wrong. Those oil fed hydraulic tensioners take up what little slack wear imposes on the timing chain setup.Chains were great when they were a foot long and drove camshafts in pushrod engines. These newer 5 foot long chains in overhead cam engines don't last like shorter chains did. When they stretch (all of them do) you lose 10 or 15 degrees of cam timing.
What world do you live in? Obviously it isn't this place I like to call reality.Belts don't stretch.
A timing belt is far, FAR more likely to fail than a timing chain. Once again, rubber vs. steel in a high temp scenario.Belts don't fail if you replace them at the proper intervals. You can replace a 4.7 timing belt in an afternoon. Not bad for ~ 100k miles of service that you get from a belt.
Pure ignorance. :td:Give me a belt any day.
Good post. I like you now LOLWell, you see, that's why they use hydraulic tensioners. The fact that guides wear and chains stretch necessitate the need for hydraulic chain tensioners. If all of these parts were static they could just use solid tensioners and never have to worry. Now, stretching like mad is an extreme overstatement for a chain. A timing chain stretches far, far less than a timing belt. Rubber versus steel, use some common sense man.
Wrong. Those oil fed hydraulic tensioners take up what little slack wear imposes on the timing chain setup.
What world do you live in? Obviously it isn't this place I like to call reality.
A timing belt is far, FAR more likely to fail than a timing chain. Once again, rubber vs. steel in a high temp scenario.
Pure ignorance. :td:
They take the slack up on the "loose" side of the chain. The chain strech (very little) is still happening between the crank and cam sprocket on the tight side, which could be a problem on some engines; however since this engine has -closed-loop- vairable valve timing, it can target specific cam timing even with chain stretch (within reason).Well, you see, that's why they use hydraulic tensioners. The fact that guides wear and chains stretch necessitate the need for hydraulic chain tensioners. If all of these parts were static they could just use solid tensioners and never have to worry. Now, stretching like mad is an extreme overstatement for a chain. A timing chain stretches far, far less than a timing belt. Rubber versus steel, use some common sense man.
Wrong. Those oil fed hydraulic tensioners take up what little slack wear imposes on the timing chain setup.
Thank you. Your pic has become my wallpaer.The 5.7 uses a chain, period. NO IFS OR BUTS, its a chain!
Agreed.Chains do stretch and the sprockets (especially the teeth) wear down causing the engine cam timing to be effected over a long period of time; how much depends on the design and length of the chain. Generally timing chains last much longer than timing belts and that is their advantage.
Timing belts are known to stretch with rpm thereby retarding the cam timing at high rpm. Although retarding cam timing at higher RPMs can be beneficial.Timing belts also stretch initially when they are new a little bit but not as much as a chain does. They tend to take a set and stay that way after the initial break in.
I'll accept that challenge. I'll lay down a $100 bill and pick out any idling vehicle with a chain. If I'm wrong, you pick up the money. That's not to say a timing chain is bad. It isn't. I also would not say it is noisy. Most folks will never hear anything different, but if you know what to listen for -and I do - you can hear it.I will not own a vehicle that has a timing belt. I saw too many of those things break and leave people stranded back in the 1980's. There's no functional advantage to a timing belt and you have to replace them at regular intervals ($$$$$), tell me how that's good engineering? Contrary to some of the posts here timing chains are not noisy. I challenge anyone to listen to any motor out there and honestly tell me that they can hear the timing chain, they can't.
It is for sure a chain, I emailed Toyota, they said it was.That is proof that it uses a timing belt, i know the difference between a chain and a rubber belt, read the pdf it is a photo advertisement of the 5.7 liter engine.